Is David Hume's argument against William Paley here a strong one Essay

Is David Humes argument against William Paley here a strong one - Essay ExampleFrom the recite of inventors who developed new ideas, this argument is flawed because there would be no logical programme that the inventors had encountered in the beginning designing their inventions. This indicates that Humes argument was based on ignorance there was no way that he would make do that new designs would be invented designs that would negate his argument.Humes argument is also flawed because of the apparent contradictions present in the argument itself. A summary of the argument indicates that Hume believed that an individual should only believe that an object is made from design if the individual had previously encountered similar design. Therefore, the argument by Hume seems to indicate that an individual who had non encountered design should not attribute designs to the running(a) of a designer. This argument means that Hume preempts the human mind the argument tries to negate the w orking of the human mind in deducing the result of design.The other factor that indicates that Humes argument was a exhausted argument is in the design of the universe. Contrary to the biological argument presented by Hume, the universe is an infinite harvesting of design. This means that any human being can attribute the design of the universe to some commanding deity, a fact that Hume tries to negate in his argument. The anthology that an individual has to have experienced design in position to recognize other instances of design would serve to negate the possibility of a supreme deity who gives human beings deductive ability. Therefore, the argument by Hume can be considered weak because of its structural failures and the proposition.The fact there exists laughable designs in the universe is also proof that Humes argument was not strong. This is because design is the product of the intellect, creativity, and innovativeness. Humes argument seems to propose that design is bor n of